|
'Utter disappointment' for Octavia Hill campaigners
The
press release began with the triumphant words, "The Church Commissioners
announce a spirit of partnership in the management of the Octavia Hill
Estates". Sadly what has followed is anything but partnership!
Rev. Benny Hazlehurst writes:
Rejecting almost all the alternative Partnership Proposal put together by
clergy & tenants (see last month's Bridge) the decision by the Church
Commissioners signals the end of Octavia Hill's vision for these estates, and
the start of market rents of up to £1,730 per month.
Sticking almost rigidly to the proposals they published in March, the
Commissioners have decided that:
- As vacancies occur,
900 of the 1,600 homes will be let at open market rents, with the remainder
available only to people nominated by public service employers
- The estates will no
longer offer social housing for the vulnerable
- Family members of
existing tenants will be excluded unless they can afford the new market
rents.
The
only real concession is that 1 in 5 new tenancies on the Walworth Estate will
be reserved for key workers.
The
reaction has been utter disappointment. Walworth Councillor, David Noakes,
said, "Their decision is just another blow at a time when social housing is
already in crisis. We have over 10,000 people on the waiting list for council
properties and thousands in unsuitable properties due to overcrowding or
ill-health."
"Listened"
Church
Commissioner, Bishop Peter Selby, said "The Assets Committee has listened to
all the views put forward. "We are grateful for the time and effort that
residents have put into the consultation, and for the constructive suggestions
which they have made"
Waterloo
& Southwark Tenants Association and Walworth Tenants Association have
rejected the Commissioners offer of partnership - Chairman, Ray Keavey said,
"Our understanding was that the Commissioners wanted involvement by the
tenants, but this appears to have been window dressing to cover up a very
cynical exercise."
In Holy
Week, protesters offered the Commissioners a choice - a palm branch or 30
pieces of silver. They chose the palm branch but now the tenants want it back.
One said, "They should have taken the silver in the first place - it's all they
ever wanted anyway!"
Background
to this story
|